CSS Extensions

@custom-selector = @custom-selector <extension-name> <selector-list> ;

@custom-selector :--heading h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6;

:--heading { /* styles for all headings */ }
:--heading + p { /* more styles */ }
/* etc */

This one’s more complicated than MQs. Brian Kardell came up with a good proposal for evaluating selectors as JS functions that return a boolean, which had decent performance characteristics by specifying the qualities of the element it was based on (which determined when it would be called).

<script>
CSS.customSelector.set("_foo",
                     {"predicate": function(el){...},
                       "matches": "a"});
</script>

"matches" is an optional selector specifying what subset of elements the custom selector is valid for. The selector is automatically false for elements that don’t match, and the predicate isn’t called.

By default, the predicate is called whenever there’s a mutation in an element that matches the "matches" selector, or one of its descendants.

You should be able to suppress the auto-calling, and be able to trigger the predicate to run manually. That way you can use mutation listeners manually to only call the predicate when necessary.

We should probably offer some sugar for filtering the list of mutations that trigger the predicate to be called. Maybe just a list of attributes that you’ll be caring about? And/or tagnames?

Maybe let the pseudo-class also accept an argument, and pass it (as a serialized string) as a second argument to the predicate. :_foo would pass null, while :_foo() would pass "".

Interesting possibilities here. Definitely need some way to define custom functions in CSS. This would, for example, let people define whatever color function they want, such as implementing the HUSL color space.

Definitely need a JS interface. What options are needed?

Call time/frequency:

• Default should probably treat the function as a preprocessor, calling the JS function once per instance in the stylesheet and substituting in the returned value.
• Should probably have an option to allow calling per element/instance combo, too. Gets called more as match results change.

We can take some cues from my thoughts on a random() function. It needs per-instance, per-element&instance, and per "identifier", so you can reuse the same value in multiple spots. That last one can probably be handled manually by the JS, so we don’t have to privilege a particular argument as an identifier.

We’d need to provide the context in which it’s used. Which property, for example. Should we allow them to be used in other places, or should we just define more contextual locations as we go? That is, should we allow custom-defined functions in @supports with this API, or should we add a .customSupports map? I suspect that individual cases will have their own useful contextual information, so it’s better to specialize each instance of custom functions.

How much can we do in pure CSS? Being able to substitute values depending on MQs or support queries would be useful. To get *real* use out of it, though, I suspect we’d need fuller support for conditionals, likely in the form of SASS’s @if or something similar.

Selectors are made of two pieces: simple selectors, and combinators. We should allow custom combinators too.

This is JS-only, because it’s transforming elements, not filtering them, and you can’t express any useful transformations in pure CSS.

You provide a function which, when given an element, produces a list of zero or more elements.

For examples, with div /--foo/ span, the CSS engine will match the first part of the selector and find all the div elements. It passes that list to the function registered for the --foo combinator, and expects to get a new list of elements returned. It then continues on its way, filtering that list to include only span elements, etc.

A child combinator would be something like:

CSS.customCombinator.set("--child", function(el) {
    return el.children;
  });

Then div /--child/ span would be identical to div > span.

If we generalize a selector with a custom combinator to A /--custom/ B, then the UA would automatically call the --custom function whenever new elements match A. If elements stop matching A, it won’t bother; it’ll just drop them from the result.

Alternately, the function could take a list of elements (all the elements matching A) and return a new list of elements. This would be a bit more complicated for the author, but would allow more variety in the types of combinators that could be defined, as you could define things that depend on the entire set of matched elements. For example, you could define A /nth 1/ B to give only the first element from the set of A matches.

(Maybe we allow both variants, since the per-element one is easier to optimize and program against, but the per-set one allows some useful stuff.)

Similarly to custom pseudo-classes, we’d allow arguments, with them parsed eagerly per-instance and passed to the combinator function.

If we do the per-element combinator function, we could potentially cache the results, so that it never needs to be called again for the same element. Possibly have a flag that turns off this behavior, so that you’re guaranteed to be called again.

This one’s even less developed, but it would be interesting to allow custom at-rules as well. It’s definitely pure-JS as well.

Unsure exactly what’s best here. Possibly register a callback per rule, which is called with the prelude/contents of the at-rule?

Should we do the callback approach, or just maintain a list of custom at-rules and let scripts parse them themselves? Unfortunately, the latter means we’d have to have a special mechanism to alert scripts when new at-rules get added or removed.

For a lot of these at-rules, we may want a way to know when they’re "applied"—when, according to the built-in at-rules like @media and @supports, the rule would be applied.